WORLDWIDE
NEWS, SPECIAL EDITION
June 24,
1985
Recent History of the Philadelphia Era
of the Worldwide Church of God
By Herbert W. Armstrong
All members need to be updated on the history of the
Philadelphia era of God's one original Church as founded
in A.D. 31
by Jesus
Christ -- especially the past 15 years of its life.
Jesus Christ said that in the world His Church would have
tribulations
and persecutions. He did not foretell clear sailing.
NO PEACEFUL
EXISTENCE IN A HOSTILE WORLD. "If they have persecuted
me, they
will also persecute you," He said. Again in God's Word we
are warned,
"It is through much tribulation that we must enter into
the Kingdom of God."
"Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which
leadeth
unto life, and few there be that find it" (Matthew 7:14).
The apostle
Paul warned the elders of the church at Ephesus that
grievous
wolves would enter in among them to destroy the flock, and
also
of their own selves some would seek to draw away disciples
after
themselves (Acts 20:29-30).
Why is this so? Why has God's Church in this Philadelphia era
gone
through a period of friction, controversy within the Church
and split-offs,
with certain ministers leaving the Church to take
followers
after themselves during the 1970s? It was even so during
the preceding
Sardis era.
And why has the Church withstood this
controversy
and even a certain amount of division in our midst and
emerged
into unity, harmony, oneness and thriving progress of the
present?
Why did the Los Angeles Times recently publish a story with a
full
six-column headline clear across the page, saying Worldwide
Church of God "Thriving on Controversy"?
These are actual events affecting our own very lives during
the past
15 years. To understand, we must refresh our minds briefly
on how
it all first started, 6,000 years ago, at the very
foundation
of the world and of the human family on earth with the
creation
of the first man Adam.
God was beginning His greatest all-time accomplishment -- to
reproduce
Himself. God had first created angels. The great
archangel
Lucifer had been placed on the throne of the earth when
God created
the earth and the vast universe. Lucifer had rebelled
against
God's government and led a third of all angels into
rebellion.
He became Satan the devil, and his angels became
perverted
demons. Then God created the first human, Adam, mortal,
out of
the dust of the earth, with only a physicochemical temporary
existence,
but offering Adam eternal God-life and opportunity to
replace
Satan on earth's throne. Adam also rebelled against God and
His government,
rejecting the tree of life, and choosing to take to
himself
the knowledge of good and evil, relying on himself instead
of God
for knowledge and the way of life.
Thereupon God closed off the tree of life (the Holy Spirit),
except
for those specially called, until Christ the second Adam yet
in the
future should replace Satan on the throne, as the first Adam
should
have done.
Traditional Christianity, theologians and Bible scholars seem
never
to have noticed that the tree of life -- which was the Holy
Spirit
imparting God-life -- was closed to the world and still today
remains
closed. God had said, "Let Us make man in Our image, after
Our likeness"
(Genesis 1:26).
"Image" refers to spiritual
character;
likeness refers to form and shape. God creates in dual
stages.
To make man in God's image means spiritual image -- a
spiritual
being with God's perfect divine character.
But the first stage of this creation was the physical human
man,
mortal, having temporary physical existence. Yet in that man,
God created
the human spirit to empower the physical brain with
intellect.
This spirit gave mortal man not only physical and
material
intelligence and mind power, but also the capacity for
good
or evil, but on the human level -- the carnal or selfish level.
Through
the symbolic tree of life God made accessible to Adam God's
Holy
Spirit to beget in him God-life of immortality and also the
God-mind
for acquiring God's spiritual knowledge and spiritual
character.
When God closed the tree of life He closed off from
mankind
this contact with God the Father, immortality, the God-mind
and what
the world calls "salvation."
But the second personage of the God family, the Word, gave up
His divinity
and was born as a human of the virgin Mary. He was God
in the
human flesh, both God and man, but functioning as a human
man in
His ministry on earth. He came to qualify, as the first Adam
had failed
to do, to replace Satan on the throne of the earth. He
came
also to call out of the world God's Church, also to qualify to
sit with
Him on this throne, and to qualify to teach and rule with
Him as
divine beings -- the very first fruits of God's harvest in
reproducing
Himself. He came also to ransom the world of humans
from
Satan, who had kidnapped all humanity. He paid this ransom
price
by His life's blood on the cross.
Jesus said He would build His Church. The word church, in the
Greek
language of the New Testament, is "ekklesia", which means
"called-out
ones." As Jesus had to qualify for the throne by
overcoming
Satan, so did His Church that is to sit with Him on that
throne
and be given power over the nations to rule, teach and
convert
into the family of God.
The original Adam could have been begotten as a son of
God --
converted -- had he taken of the tree of life. This begettal
would
have come through the Holy Spirit. When God closed off the
tree
of life, He closed off reconciliation to God the Father -- that
is, conversion
or begettal of divine God-life. The world as a whole
is still
cut off to this day from that begettal, commonly spoken of
by Protestants
as "being saved." No such salvation is even yet
available
to the world. The world of traditional Christianity is
blinded
to this fact.
But the Church was called out of the world, to be separate in
living
by God's law instead of Satan's way of self-centeredness,
competition
and strife, following the first Adam. That is why Jesus
said
the Church would be persecuted, even as He had been. Those
called
into the Church would live by God's way of love, not the
world's
way of selfishness, contention and strife. This required
the presence
and flowing into them of the Holy Spirit of God,
giving
them a different purpose in life and a different mind and
attitude
than formerly in the world.
Why did Christ call the Church out of the world to be separate
from
the world? They were called as students. The Bible calls them
disciples.
The word disciple means student or learner. The Church
was like
at school, and Jesus was the original teacher. He called
out of
the world His 12 disciples, or students, for the very
purpose
of educating them to become teachers, and also rulers with
and under
Christ, when Jesus comes in power and glory to sit on
Satan's
throne over all the earth and to rule as well as to convert
all nations.
To those in the Church who are growing in grace and spiritual
knowledge,
Jesus says He will give power over the nations to rule
them
-- they shall sit with Him on His earthly throne, and they shall
be made
priests or teachers and kings and rule with Christ on the
earth
(Revelation 2:26-27, 3:21 and 5:10).
The Church is actually a school teaching students to become
teachers
and rulers in God's Kingdom.
But these students -- or Church members -- must first themselves
be converted,
begotten as children of God, having received the Holy
Spirit
(tree of life) that Adam rejected. Why? Because the
natural-born
carnal mind cannot understand the spiritual knowledge
and truths
of God (I Corinthians 2:9-14). Therefore God has made
special
provision, predestining those He calls out of the world to
be called
now, in the Church age, BEFORE God opens the tree of life
and salvation
to the world as a whole. That is why the Church is
called
the "first fruits" of God's harvest for His Kingdom.
Let it be emphasized again. As Christ the second Adam came to
qualify
to replace Satan on earth's throne, God chose and called
certain
ones out of the world also to qualify to sit with Christ on
that
throne. This is not the time God is trying to "save the
world."
God's judgment day for the world has not yet come. But to
those
specially called for the very purpose of sitting on that
throne
with Christ, it was necessary that they receive the Holy
Spirit
before they could learn God's truth, which the first Adam
had rejected.
That is why the Church is only the "first fruits" of
those
ultimately to receive salvation.
We receive the Holy Spirit ONLY after complete repentance of
the way
we were living. We must come out of this world to live a
life
separate from the life and ways of the world, with our minds
on things
of God, not things of this world.
That is why we are opposed and persecuted by the world. That
is why
they persecuted Jesus Christ. That is why some who become
somewhat
interested, are baptized and start in the Church, drift
back
into the world and leave the Church. Many professed to repent
and be
baptized who had not repented, but were accepted by Church
members
as brethren. These false brethren did and always have
entered
into the Church professing to be members.
Jesus preached a definite Gospel. That and that alone is the
Gospel
of Jesus Christ. It was a Gospel message about the Kingdom
of God
-- the begotten and finally to be born family of God -- a family
of divine
persons, begotten and finally to be born of God.
Jesus came. He called and taught His disciples. One of the
original
12 turned against Him, Judas Iscariot. Jesus taught His
students.
Then He died for the sins of the world and commissioned
those
He had taught to go into all the world and teach in all
nations
the same message He had taught them.
They were to baptize those who repented and believed. But
Jesus
Himself said plainly, "No man can come to me, except the
Father
which hath sent me draw him" (John 6:44). Through
predestination
God chooses and calls those He nominates to qualify
to sit
with Christ on the earth's throne when Satan is removed. At
that
time, beginning with the Second Coming of Christ, God will
open
the tree of life to everyone then living. For the previously
uncalled,
judgment will be on them by a resurrection from the dead
after
the thousand years' reign with Christ. Judgment will then
have
come to all who ever lived. But at the present time judgment
is on
the Church only (I Peter 4:17).
After Jesus' death and resurrection He ascended to heaven to
sit with
God on God's throne, where He is today. Ten days after His
ascension
days after His death -- the Holy Spirit descended and
filled
His disciples. That day of "first fruits" the Church was
born.
It thrived and grew amazingly, but soon opposition and
persecution
set in. By A.D. 51, much of the Church in Galatia had
turned
to another gospel (Galatians 1:6-7). A violent controversy
arose
over whether the Gospel to be preached was the Gospel of
Christ
or a gospel ABOUT Christ. The latter won out. There ensued
a "lost
century" in the history of the Church, from about A.D. 70
to 170.
The original true Church survived, but gradually lost much
of Jesus'
teaching and biblical truth. By the early part of the
20th
century much of God's purpose and truth had been lost -- but the
struggling
true Church still had the name Church of God, the Ten
Commandments
including the Sabbath, and also tithing.
I came among the brethren of the Sardis era upon conversion
from
1927. I never did become a member of that era of the Church.
In 1930
a division occurred among the Oregon brethren, resulting in
the formation
of the Oregon Conference of the Church of God. The
Sardis era of the Church had become, virtually spiritually
dead.
That
was the beginning of a gradual transition to the Philadelphia
era.
I was ordained in June of precisely a century of time cycles
after
the original apostles were ordained -- in this transition era
by the
Oregon
Conference of the Church of God.
I continued to work
with
and fellowship with West Coast members of the Sardis era until
1942,
when the rapidly growing work of the fledgling Philadelphia
era required
my full time. The present era was officially begun in
October,
1933. For the next 35 years it grew steadily at the
average
rate of approximately 30 percent per year.
Ambassador College was founded Oct. 8, 1947, amid a
life-and-death
financial struggle for existence.
Ever since 1930 in the Sardis church there had been opposition
and political
infighting among some ministers.
In 1927 God opened my eyes to the continuing command to
observe
the annual Sabbaths, as well as the weekly Sabbath. None of
the Sardis
era brethren in the United States would accept this
truth
of the annual Sabbaths, except for two or three families. As
God continued
to restore lost truths to His Church through me, the
Sardis
era brethren rejected all restored truths.
After two years of Ambassador College teaching in preparing
new young
ministers, the Church started its rapid growth and soon
new local
churches were being raised up in ever-increasing number
as ministers
were trained to pastor them.
The radio broadcasts, started January, 1934, continued to
bring
an ever-increasing number of candidates for baptism and
conversion.
The end time had come. God was preparing a Church, well
organized
on His own pattern, to be prepared as kings and priests
to reign
with Christ at His coming. Beside the growth of the Plain
Truth
magazine, I was continuing to write many booklets on various
important
doctrines and truths. Television did not go on the air
until
after World War II ended in 1945. We did not go on TV until
July
of 1955, but discontinued it after six months. Radio
broadcasting
had increased greatly, and in the latter 1950s the
World
Tomorrow program was using more wattage of radio power than
any program
on earth. The Church was broadcasting daily, seven
nights
a week.
In 1960 the second Ambassador campus was started at Bricket
Wood,
19 miles northwest of London, in England. My elder son,
Richard
David Armstrong, had become the most-loved minister in the
Church,
but he died as the result of a head-on automobile crash
while
on a baptizing trip in late July, 1958, while in his 30th
year.
In 1964, the third college campus was opened at Big Sandy,
Tex.
The Work of the Church was fast developing worldwide. In 1967,
April
15, my beloved wife, Loma, died after a happy marriage of 50
years.
It was her challenge about the Sabbath in late 1926 that had
led to
my conversion, and she had been an important half of my
ministry.
The growth of the Church was continuing until about 1972.
In 1968 word came to me through our German Office that King
Leopold
III of Belgium had said that he would like to meet me. I
visited
him at his chateau in Belgium, and a long friendship
developed
affectionately until his death in late September, 1983.
This led to meetings with many heads of governments of many
nations
until my heart failure in August, 1977. During those years
the Ambassador
Foundation was developing with projects in different
nations
in many parts of the world. I had been traveling overseas
about
300 out of the 365 days a year.
Up through the 1960's, with new lost truths being continually
restored
to this era of God's Church, there had been little
contention
or opposition within the Church. But the wily Satan was
not to
allow this growth in harmony and peace and unity to continue
without
opposition. We were to learn the truth of Jesus' parable of
the sower
and the seed (Luke 8).
The seed sown was the Word of God -- the Bible. The Word was
being
proclaimed over the United States, Canada, Britain, Europe
and some
other parts of the world. It fell on four types or
classifications
of people. The first and largest number were those
by the
wayside. They heard, but "then cometh the devil, and taketh
away
the word out of their hearts, lest they should believe and be
saved."
These were the millions who hear, but the truth of God's
Word
never sank in. There was no response from this largest number,
though
they did hear, at least in part.
The second group were those on the rocks, who, when they
heard,
were interested and received the message with joy. Many of
these
were baptized. But they had no root, and temporarily
believed,
but because they lacked depth of purpose or capacity to
grow
spiritually, soon dropped out.
The third group were among
thorns. When they heard they were
baptized.
But the cares and interests of the world choked them.
They
still wanted to be like the world. They were liberals. They
brought
forth "no fruit to perfection."
The fourth group, smallest of all, were those on "good
ground,"
which kept the word and came out of the world, growing
spiritually
in character and biblical knowledge. They brought forth
"fruit
with patience," in various degrees (see also Matthew 13:23).
So it has been, especially since about 1969 in God's Church.
The world looks on such events occurring in any church as
evidence
of corruption or wrongdoing or something wrong and
reprehensible
in the church. Worldly clubs, societies or churches
do not
generally seem to have such troubles or controversies. Satan
does
not bother them. They are already on his side, but Satan seeks
to destroy
God's one and only true Church.
Now how did these controversies, troubles or divisions occur?
It's
time our members knew the truth.
Late in 1971 many of our members became confused over
propaganda
reaching our people over a "sacred names" teaching. This
purported
that whenever the names of God or of Jesus are mentioned,
they
must not be spoken by their names in the English language, but
in the
Hebrew language.
In other words, we could read and discuss the Bible as
translated
into the English language in all terms except the names
of God
or of Jesus Christ. Then we must speak Hebrew.
God's name, they had come to believe, could not be spoken
except
in the Hebrew language. They overlooked the fact that all
original
copies of the New Testament were inspired by the same God
through
Jesus Christ, the Word of God, and inspired by the Holy
Spirit
in the Greek language. In numerous instances the inspired
New Testament,
inspired in the Greek language, quoted Old Testament
passages
containing the names of God. And in every case God through
the Holy
Spirit used the Greek names for God and the One who became
Jesus,
and NOT THE HEBREW LANGUAGE.
Certain ones were leaving the Church to join this false
movement,
being misled into believing God's Church to be in error.
At that time, it was suggested that a special Doctrinal Team
be appointed
to research the question more technically to verify
the real
truth. We wanted the teaching and doctrines of the Church
to be
verified beyond any room for doubts. I appointed A Doctrinal
Research
Committee to pursue an in-depth research of the subject.
A small few Ambassador graduates who had become ministers in
the Church
were somewhat scholarly inclined, especially one who had
a specific
problem. He suffered from an inferiority complex.
Because
some of our graduates at the time were enrolling in outside
universities
for higher degrees, a few came to conceive that a
"scholar"
was in the loftiest position of humanity.
If this inferiority sufferer could feel in his own mind that
he was
a scholar he would feel elevated above other people and
therefore
delivered from feelings of inferiority. He began to
question
some of the established doctrines of the Church of God,
such
as counting the day of Pentecost, divorce and remarriage,
tithing
and others.
Soon he was entering into what he considered a scholarly
research
to DISprove some of the Church's basic teachings.
Gradually
one or two others, then even more, joined in a
self-appointed
"scholarly research" to DISprove plain biblical
truths.
It became evident that those attending other universities came
to consider
Ambassador College as inferior and substandard
intellectually
and academically because of our belief in God.
Secularism
and the anti-God approach of evolution seemed to them
far superior
to the revealed knowledge of God.
The first committee I had assigned to research the "sacred
names"
error did reaffirm the truth on that question beyond doubt.
But soon
a few would-be scholars had established themselves into a
"Doctrinal
Team." What started as an honest effort to find and
establish
real TRUTH in due time turned into a group or "would-be
scholars"
not appointed by me, seeking to destroy the true
doctrines
of the Church.
This brought controversy into the Church. These self-professed
"scholars,"
influenced by teaching in universities in which they
were
enrolling for higher degrees, were becoming more and more
liberal.
They wanted to skirt as close as possible to the precipice
of secularism,
falling off the cliff into Satan's world.
These were the years when my commission required that I be
absent
from Pasadena, and traveling overseas to almost all parts of
the world
as many as 300 of the 365 days of the year. This liberal
group,
small at first, came to be in executive positions at
Pasadena,
surrounding and influencing the one responsible for
day-to-day
administration at headquarters during my absence. Much
of what
they did was carefully kept from me.
Those of higher rank, but subject to the one in day-to-day
executive
administration at Pasadena, who were steadfastly loyal to
the Church
and its true teachings, were suppressed or gradually
removed
from Pasadena and sent "into the field," pastoring single
churches
in other locations. So much of what was going on in
Pasadena
was kept from me that I did not realize the direction the
Church
was actually traveling into controversy, liberalism and
either
Protestantism or total secularism.
It was then that the matter of obtaining accreditation from
the organized
accreditation societies of secular education became
a problem.
The liberals at Pasadena wanted accreditation. They did
not want
to be accredited as a Bible college, but as a full
competing
college or university. As such the college would fall
under
the rules of the secular accrediting society, which would
more
or less determine policy and curricula.
Finally this effort on the part of the liberals increased the
enrollment
of the college from the approximate 500 limit that I had
set to
about 1,400 and going up. It was no longer God's college. I
had realized
the danger of a student body in excess of 500
students,
in residence on campus, and had set that as a definite
college
policy. But during those years when I was absent from
Pasadena
headquarters most of the time, changes were being
gradually
made in college policies as well as Church doctrines.
Jesus Christ had founded this college through me as God's
college.
I had realized the state into which higher education had
drifted
into materialism. Moral and spiritual values were being
overlooked
almost entirely in colleges and universities. I had
realized
the tremendous responsibility to avoid neglecting this
missing
dimension in education at the time of founding Ambassador
College.
From its founding I had made the slogan of the college,
"Recapture
True Values." The college started with the highest moral
and spiritual
values. It was God's college. A high moral and
spiritual
conduct had been vigorously taught and maintained. There
was much
teaching against "necking," and any sort of lovemaking
among
students. "Going steady" toward marriage was forbidden until
the end
of the first semester of the senior year. Smoking and the
use of
drugs were positively prohibited.
But as the liberal element gained control of the campus
administration
during those years of my long absences from
Pasadena,
the high standard of student conduct was more and more
liberalized
through lack of discipline or enforcement. The college
was coming
to be more like other college campuses.
At this juncture let me jump ahead of the sequence of events
a bit
to say that, after sufficient recovery from my heart failure
in August
of 1977, I found it necessary in 1978 to close the
college
at Pasadena completely (the colleges in Bricket Wood,
England,
and at Big Sandy had then already been closed) and to
start
Ambassador College in Pasadena all over again with one
freshman
class only, except for a few in proper attitude and
character
who were retained to allow them to complete their studies
until
graduation. Also on Aug. 21, 1981, the campus in Big Sandy
was reopened.
But now back to the sequence of events.
I quote now from a memorandum by Leroy Neff, the current
treasurer,
who was on the first Doctrinal Research Committee and
wrote
concerning others on the committee. I am quoting this to give
an example
of the direction some of the liberals on the doctrinal
committee
were taking.
1. Any marriage where the people are unconverted, or did not
fully
know what they were getting into, was not a valid marriage.
2. Polygamy was tacitly approved by God in Old Testament
times,
so multiple marriages or divorces in modern times might just
be a
form of polygamy by having wives sequentially rather than
concurrently.
3. God divorced ancient Israel and then both parties were free
to remarry.
4. The ministry should be able to loose marriages that God had
joined.
These liberals wanted complete freedom in the Church for
divorce
and remarriage at will. Other questions raised by the
liberals
were complete freedom for any type marriage, some more and
some
less freedom from tithing, doing away with or modifying Church
teachings
on healing by direct prayer as in James 5:14, complete
freedom
for women in facial makeup, and even the approval of
celebrating
birthdays (never approved in the Bible) and even of
voting
in elections as part of the world.
On the Pasadena campus more and more friction developed
between
the liberals and those loyal ministers and members who held
to the
biblical truths God had placed in His Church. It was a sort
of cold
war of nerves.
It had become custom to hold an annual ministerial conference
of ministers
at Pasadena headquarters. In the 1974 to 1977
conferences,
these meetings had been marred by controversies over
doctrinal
issues.
Just before the January, 1978, conference I was determined to
prevent
doctrinal controversy. I was also due to leave on another
'round-the-world
trip. I had decided to postpone the trip until
after
the conference in order to keep controversy out of the
conference.
But the one to be left in charge in my absence urged me
to remain
for the opening morning session, so that I could open the
conference,
and keep my departure at 12 noon, and he gave me his
word
no doctrines would be discussed in the conference, only
administrative
matters.
I agreed to this. I opened the conference, left immediately
for the
airport and had lunch on the plane. I was going first to
Japan,
then across the north pole to Europe, and into western
Africa
before returning to Pasadena.
I had not gotten very far out over the Pacific Ocean that
afternoon,
until in the afternoon session of the conference a
voluminous
printed work called "Systematic Theology Project," or
"STP"
for short, was distributed to the ministry with specific
instructions
that this was a definite outline of basic Church
doctrines,
and no minister was to preach anything contrary to this
treatise.
I knew absolutely nothing of this STP, or that it had been in
preparation.
It had been carefully concealed from me. It was a
flagrant
violation of the promise made to induce me to leave so
this
doctrinal change in Church teaching could be given to all
ministers
without my knowledge. I knew nothing of this STP in spite
of claims
made by others, until a copy was brought to me by some
loyal
ministers in late April or early May of 1978 when I then
notified
every minister in the world to return his copy immediately
and ignore
all its liberal doctrines and teachings.
It has come to my attention that some of the liberals, no
longer
members of God's Church, have claimed that I did know of
this
infamous STP project. That is positively NOT TRUE. A few
papers
on one or two subjects, which were not liberal, had been
brought
to me in Tucson, Ariz., but no clear mention was made of
the preparations
under way for producing this STP project. None of
the liberalized
teachings in the STP were shown to me or approved
by me
at any time.
Some of these liberal ministers who worked on and produced the
STP and
the one who was in charge of executive administration in my
absence
were disfellowshipped and others left the Church.
At the time of the Feast of Tabernacles that fall, 1978, at a
Festival
held by one of these split-off liberals and a few who
followed,
in their own Feast of Tabernacles, a conspiracy was
hatched
to attack and destroy the Church by the legal process of a
class
action lawsuit. Some six or seven liberals, former members.
signed
the suit against the Church. This resulted in an ex parte
order
by a judge. Secretly without prior notice, deputies on order
of the
Attorney General's office swooped down on the Church on the
morning
or Jan. 3, 1979. The ex parte order had been signed by a
judge
late the day before.
A very severe struggle for the existence and life of the
Church
ensued. Some months later the State dropped the case, and
still
later an appellate choral judge issued a declaration from the
bench
that the lawsuit was groundless and should never have been
filed.
Even to this day some newspaper comments mention the false
charges
accusing me of misuse of millions of dollars of Church
funds,
but they never mention our vindication of these false
charges.
However, this class action State of California lawsuit brought
on by
dissident members and former members did, virtually, result
in a
housecleaning of the liberals, malcontents and troublemakers,
who were
causing division in the Church of the living God. And the
Church
has enjoyed a most healthy development and growth in these
past
five years since.
Now a recap of what has happened to the Church and its work.
God had blessed His Church with an unprecedented approximate
increase
of 30 percent per year for 35 years. As these liberals
began
gaining more and more control God removed His blessing. I
have
often said that God blesses us as we please Him. During these
liberal
years in the 1970s, the income virtually stagnated. In 1974
the Church
experienced a 1.6 percent decrease in income under 1973,
the first
negative growth in the Church's history. It fell another
4.8 percent
the following year.
Since God brought me back from total heart failure, and
directed
me in removing these liberals, and putting the Church back
on track,
He has restored His blessings. Income for the Church this
year
will run two times the dollar volume of 1978. Income growth is
allowing
the Church to get the Gospel of the Kingdom of God to the
world
as a witness as never before. The physical blessings are
matched
by new spiritual growth and new truth added to His Church.
For 35 years the Church grew at the average rate of nearly 30
percent
per year -- a phenomenal and so far as I know unprecedented
growth
for almost any kind of organization. When I gradually
started
handing over the broadcasting of the World Tomorrow
program,
it was primarily radio and had grown to be by far the
largest
program, especially classified as religious, in the world,
using
more wattage of radio power than any other program.
But by 1978, it had become virtually the smallest. Meanwhile,
the work
had again started on TV in 1967. I had first gone on TV in
June,
1955, but discontinued TV after six months. We restarted in
1967
with one or two stations, but my voice was not then heard on
television.
It gradually increased to about 90 stations in 1975.
During most of these years the telecasting was ineffective in
getting
out the real Gospel.
By 1978 we went down to about 5O stations weekly. At that
period
following my heart failure while in Tucson, I once again
took
over TV broadcasting. We held steady while I was stuck in
Tucson
until 1981, when I came back to headquarters at Pasadena.
From
that time the TV program has produced steady growth, until
today
we are the second in the world in the religious category,
with
over 300 TV stations worldwide. Hopefully we shall soon be the
largest.
Since the beginning of 1985, we have averaged around 13,000
telephone
responses per program. Four times this year so far we
have
received over 17,000 telephone responses and once over 18,000.
Now look at the facts of the Plain Truth circulation. From its
peak
worldwide circulation in 1973, during the liberal years the
number
of subscriptions went from 3.1 million down to just over one
million
in January, 1977. In 1974, funding for preaching of the
Gospel
in international areas was cut off because of financial
crises
in Pasadena. In Europe at the time, it meant the untimely
end of
a newsstand program that had taken two years to build across
the Continent.
Personnel from Pasadena were sent to the U.K. to cut off these
funds
and make reductions as part of an overall policy of making
all international
areas self supporting. The result was a decline
in Plain
Truth circulations around the world.
During that period in 1975, the fine quality of The Plain
Truth
was reduced down to a tabloid, printed on cheap newsprint
paper.
In 1976, I restored The Plain Truth to the high quality
magazine
standard.
It is now clearly evident that God brought me back for a vital
purpose,
by CPR, from death by heart failure. Had I remained dead
the Church
of the living God would have been virtually destroyed by
the liberal
element that had crept in, especially in headquarters
administration
during my absence from Pasadena. During those
liberal
years, much of what was going on in policy changing and
doctrinal
liberalization had been carefully kept from me.
The Church of God was being systematically liberalized, the
broadcasting
had gone from top to bottom in the world, and from
spiritual
effectiveness to almost total ineffectiveness. God says
we are
to judge by the fruits. During those liberal years, the
Church
was bearing virtually no fruit. The Plain Truth and
publishing
work also had become almost totally ineffective.
Ambassador
College had been destroyed as God's college. In 1978,
after
my "resurrection" from total heart failure, I had to
completely
close Ambassador College at Pasadena, starting all over
again,
as in 1947, with one freshman class. The colleges in England
and in
Texas had already been closed.
It is very evident to those led by the Holy Spirit of God that
there
was a very significant reason why God brought me back to life
at age
85 in 1977 to once again take over the reins and remove this
liberal
element -- to once again recapture the true values and to
prepare
this Philadelphia era of God's Church for the coming of
Christ
and the reign of the Kingdom of God.
Today the bona fide Plain Truth circulation is over 7.5
million.
The Youth magazine has gained an already large circulation
nearing
200,000. The Good News magazine circulation is projected to
reach
close to one million subscribers monthly by the end of this
year.
The Bible Correspondence Course has been rejuvenated with a
present
enrollment of approximately 130,000 students worldwide.
God has revealed much vitally important new biblical truth.
The Church
has taken on a new spiritual vitality. Ambassador
College
is once again God's college and students are serving in a
number
of important projects in other nations around the world.
Many
of the important new biblical truths will be covered in the
new book
Mystery of the Ages.
Those liberals who went out or were put out of the Church
through
1979 have no idea of the difference in the Church today. It
is as
different as white is from black or up is from down. In those
years,
headquarters was filled with contention, political striving
for status
and power. The atmosphere was rife with doctrinal
disputations
and contentions. There's an old saying, "When the
cat's
away, the mice begin to play."
While I was away from headquarters, there were strivings and
contentions
over policy, doctrines, not only on the headquarters
campus
but in many local churches. A liberal minority of members
was causing
contention. The membership dipped slightly since a
certain
number followed these liberals who left. God was weeding
out these
members and liberal ministers who were causing division
in the
Church. The contenders, the disgruntled, the liberals did
not want
God's government in the Church.
Speaking primarily of religious leaders, Jesus said: "Ye shall
know
them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs
of thistles?
Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but
a corrupt
tree bringeth forth evil fruit" (Matthew 7:16-17).
The "fruits" of the rebel leaders and "liberals" of the 1970s
should
now be clear to all. After some 35 years of steady growth in
all facets
of the Work of God's Church, the rate of growth began to
slow,
then ceased entirely in some areas, and, finally, even
decreases
began to be experienced in the number of radio and
television
stations, Plain Truth circulation, number of prospective
members,
number of co-workers, amount of income for the Work,
etc.
-- all under the "leadership" of the liberal element. These are
well-documented
facts that cannot be denied.
I want you, brethren, to think about and understand what
happened
to God's Church in the 1970s "lest history repeat itself!"
I
want you to see the "fruits" of rebelling against God's way and
God's
government.
After all, the basic issue all along was that of God's
government
in the Church. One who followed one liberal who, as the
apostle
Paul had predicted, sought to draw away followers after
himself
(Acts 20:30) said, "We are liberated from that church
government
and now have a loosely knit organization, and that's the
way we
like it."
Those liberals, who are no longer in God's Church, actually
seem
to be more interested in news of the Church -- especially false
accusations,
criticisms and persecutions of enemies -- than are the
loyal
members of the Church. It would seem the chief interest in
their
lives is to hear false reports, accusations and innuendos
against
the church.
Daniel prophesied of our time: "Many shall be purified, and
made
white, and tried; but the wicked shall do wickedly: and none
of the
wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand"
(Daniel
12:10). Truly this has been a time of trying and testing.
We are
the first fruits called to be students that we may become
kings
and priests and rule with Christ (Revelation 5:10). We in the
Church
are students, and we are in the time of final exams.
Little groups, splintering off, centered in Washington, D.C.;
Eugene,
Ore.; Tyler, Tex.; Monterey, Calif.; and other places with
groups
too small to mention. They are not bearing fruit for the
Kingdom.
They are not pleasing God or being blessed by Him. Jesus
said,
"By their fruits you shall know them." They usually claim to
be
"branches" of the Church of God. But Jesus said, "I will build
my
church" (Matthew 16:18). He did not say denominations, sects,
cults,
branches or a church divided against itself. Rather He said
a
house divided against itself cannot stand. There is one true
Church
and one only. The apostle Paul pictured humanly
self-appointed
"branches" when he said to the elders of the local
church
at Ephesus that some of their own selves would depart to
draw
a following after themselves.
Paul said, "But now are they
many members, yet but one body"
(I Corinthians
12:20). How was that one body organized? Did it have
one government?
"And God hath set some in the church, first
apostles,
secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that
miracles,
then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities
of tongues"
(verse 28). Verse 25 shows there should be no divisions
in
the body -- no branches or branch organizations.
The Church is "built upon the foundation of the apostles
and
prophets,
Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner stone; in
Whom
all the building fitly framed together growth unto an holy
Temple
in the Lord" (Ephesians 2:20-21). Note, the Church is
organized
and fitly framed together, not organized with competing
and differing
branches.
Notice Ephesians 4, there is only one organized church "fitly
joined
together and compacted" (verse 16) -- compacted as if welded
together
into one well organized body. And how did He organize this
body?
How was it governed? "And he gave some, apostles; and some,
prophets;
and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
for the
perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for
the edifying
of the body of Christ: till we all come in the unity
of the
faith ... (Ephesians 4:11-13). It is not DISunity or some
other
type of organization and government. Paul also said "that ye
all
speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you;
but
that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in
the
same judgment" (I Corinthians 1:10).
A primary reason for the contentions and slowing down in the
growth
of the Church during the liberal years is the fact that, in
our desire
to hold rebellious and liberal ministers and members
within
our fellowship, we did not rigidly obey the command of
Romans
16:17: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause
divisions
and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have
learned;
and avoid them." Also in I Corinthians 5:11: "But now I
have
written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is
called
a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or
a railer,
or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not
to eat."
To make clear one of the reasons -- if not the primary
reason
-- for the conflict caused by the liberal element, I quote
from
a Western newspaper. In an interview with a former minister,
who had
sought to draw away a following of members after himself,
it was
stated concerning this split-of-church that they have "a
completely
different administrative structure."
The story continued to explain that they totally differ with
the governmental
structure of God's Church. He was quoted as saying
"he also
does not believe in expelling people from the church if
they
do not live up to its teachings." It also stated they believe
"the
church is where people belong to help them overcome their
problems."
In other words the liberal idea is to disobey God's
instruction
to disfellowship and avoid those who are contentious
and cause
division and accept members who believe and live contrary
to the
teachings of Christ and the Bible.
Most of the dissension of the past in the Church had been over
the
matter of government. The dissenters believe in a very liberal
government -- the way of Satan and his world. The whole purpose of
the Gospel
is to call those chosen by God out of this world and its
ways
into the ways of God. God's government is based on God's law.
All government,
even in the world's nations, is based on a
foundation
of law. A law is simply the rules of human conduct and
behavior.
The righteousness of God merely means righteous conduct
and behavior
based on the great spiritual law of God.
Christ said, "Every plant, which My heavenly Father hath not
planted,
shall be rooted up" (Matthew 15:13). And the apostle John
also
stated, "They went out from us, but they were not of us ..." (I
John
2:19).
We who remain in the one and only true Church grieve over the
loss
of those who are so far failing in their final exams.
But sadly we remember that part of the responsibility is ours
in not
strictly heeding the admonition in Romans 16:17 to note
those
that cause division and avoid them. We love them all and pray
for them.
Some of them who have gone out from us were parents,
children,
brothers, sisters or close relatives to those who remain
steadfast.
Meanwhile we pray also that God will keep those of us who
remain
loyal, constantly steadfast, growing in grace and spiritual
character
and the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ,
overcoming
self, the world and Satan and enduring to the end. Pray
that
you, the loyal members of God's Church, remain dedicated to
the Kingdom
of God -- which is the government of God.
Now one final reminder to the Church and all loyal ministers.
If any
who have gone out from this wonderful fellowship that we
have
in God's one and only true Church, profess repentance and wish
to come
back, they must now, as John the Baptist said, "Bring forth
fruits
meet for repentance" or prove their repentance by
performance
over an adequate period of time. I personally do, and
hope
all of our loyal members will, pray for their repentance and
ultimate
return.
The Church is the embryo of the coming Kingdom of God, which
is the
family of God. There will be no divisions in that Kingdom.
There
must be none in the Church.
A final personal word. In a few days I will be 93 years of
age.
For some years now, there have been some, like vultures,
waiting
for me to die. They would like to come back and take over
the
leadership of the Church in my stead. I have been deeply
concerned
about this, but in no sense worried. This is the Church
of God,
not of any man. Jesus Christ is the living Head of this
Church.
I am not.
And Jesus Christ will never receive any of those who have gone
out to
draw a following after themselves to come back and lead
God's
Church into Satan's liberalism. It would be no longer God's
Church, even as Ambassador College was no longer God's college, and
Christ
had to start it all over again through me with one freshman
class.
When I have, even rarely, mentioned my concern in this
category,
the response of members has always been the belief that
God will
keep me alive. I hope that He will, and I do try to take
every
care of my health and physical condition, but whether God
keeps
me alive 10 more years, or only 10 more minutes is entirely
in God's
hands. Brethren, put your faith in Christ and the living
God and
not in me. If Christ should remove me, He will direct the
Advisory
Council of Elders to select one of them to continue
leading
you until the coming of Jesus Christ in power and in glory.
Pray
that God will keep YOU in His Church until He replaces this
evil
world and brings the wonderful, peaceful and blessed Kingdom
of God.